Election Court Reviews Eligibility Case Against Two Senators
The Supreme Court's Election Division has begun reviewing evidence in a case challenging the eligibility of two senators accused of registering in the wrong professional group.
On November 6, 2026, the Supreme Court's Election Division held a second evidence review session regarding a petition filed by reserve senator Akarawat Pongthanachalitkul. The case, registered as case number Lat Sor Wor 10/2569, challenges the eligibility of two senators from Amnat Charoen province: Daeng Kongma and Somphan Phalasak. The petitioner alleges that the two senators registered under the incorrect professional category. According to the petition, the senators, who are involved in fresh pork sales and noodle shop operations, were certified under Group 10, despite their occupations allegedly falling under Group 19, which covers independent professions and general trade. The court has scheduled the commencement of witness testimony for November 24, 2026, with notable figures such as Somchai Srisutthiyakorn and Yingcheep Atchanont expected to testify. A final ruling is anticipated by December 2026. For residents and observers, this case highlights ongoing scrutiny regarding the integrity of the Senate selection process. While the court proceedings are currently underway, the final outcome remains to be confirmed. The legal determination will clarify whether the senators' registration violated the 2018 Organic Act on the Acquisition of Senators, potentially impacting the composition of the upper house.
