Politics
Parliamentary Scrutiny Over NACC Conduct Regarding Saksayam Chidchob Case
Opposition leaders are demanding transparency from House Speaker Sophon Sarum regarding the 82-day delay in referring a petition against the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to the Supreme Court.
On August 27, 2026, during a parliamentary session, Democrat Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva and MP Parit Wacharasindhu formally questioned House Speaker Sophon Sarum regarding the status of a petition filed under Section 236 of the Constitution. The petition seeks the appointment of an independent investigative committee to review the NACC’s decision to dismiss a case involving allegations that Saksayam Chidchob concealed shareholdings.
Abhisit noted that 82 days have passed since the request was submitted, yet the matter has not been forwarded to the President of the Supreme Court. While acknowledging the Speaker’s decision to form a preliminary committee to review the legal merits of the petition, Abhisit urged the Speaker to disclose the names of the committee members to ensure transparency and public confidence. He further requested a clear timeline for the committee’s deliberations and a commitment to publicizing the final findings and the reasoning behind the decision.
For residents and observers, this development highlights ongoing tensions regarding the accountability of independent state agencies. Speaker Sophon assured the assembly that the committee consists of external experts and promised that the final results, including the names of the members and the rationale for the decision, will be made public to maintain institutional integrity. It remains to be confirmed when the committee will conclude its review and whether the petition will ultimately be forwarded to the Supreme Court.