General
Induction Furnace Steel Industry Defends Quality Standards Amid Public Scrutiny
Representatives from the induction furnace (IF) steel sector are pushing back against claims linking their products to structural failures, citing official investigations and national standards.
Amorn Uengsomboon, Vice President of the Induction Furnace Steel Association, has publicly addressed recent criticisms regarding the quality of IF-produced steel. Amidst allegations that such steel contributed to the collapse of a building under the Office of the Auditor General (OAG), industry representatives argue that these claims are unfounded and potentially motivated by market competition.
According to reports from Khaosod Online, official investigations conducted by the Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, alongside academic institutions like AIT, Chulalongkorn University, and King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, concluded that the building collapse was caused by flawed construction techniques and design errors—specifically regarding the length of steel reinforcement in shear walls—rather than the quality of the materials used. Furthermore, testing of steel samples from the site by the Structural Engineers Association of Thailand reportedly showed that 95% of the materials met high standards.
For residents and those involved in local construction, this clarification highlights the importance of distinguishing between material quality and structural engineering practices. While the industry maintains that IF steel fully complies with Thai Industrial Standards (TIS), the debate underscores ongoing tensions within the construction sector. It remains to be confirmed how these industry defenses will influence future regulatory discussions or public perception regarding construction safety standards in Thailand.